Unpacking 'Never Trust A Man With Eyes Too Close Together'

Table of Contents

• Unpacking 'Never Trust a Man with Eyes Too Close Together'
• Deconstructing the Adverb "Never"
• The Origins of Whimsical Warnings
• Unpacking "Never Trust a Man with Eyes Too Close Together"
  • Is It a Medical Condition?
  • The Perception of Attractiveness and Symmetry
• The Psychology Behind Facial Characteristics and Trust
• Beyond the Eyes: Other "Never Trust" Adages
• The Danger of Superficial Judgments: A YMYL Perspective
• Cultivating True Trust: A Deeper Look
• Navigating Human Interaction with Nuance
• Conclusion

Have you ever paused to ponder the meaning behind a seemingly whimsical quote, one that sticks in your mind even if you can't quite pinpoint its origin or logic? One such adage that has permeated popular culture, often delivered with a knowing wink or a cautionary tone, is the saying, "never trust a man with eyes too close together." This phrase, intriguing in its specificity, invites us to delve into the fascinating intersection of human perception, folklore, and the very real psychological underpinnings of how we assess trustworthiness. But what does it truly mean to "never" trust someone based on such a singular physical characteristic? And is there any merit to such a claim, or is it merely a relic of a bygone era's superstitions?

In this comprehensive exploration, we will dissect the origins and implications of this curious saying, examining the literal definition of 'never,' the psychology behind facial characteristics, and the broader societal tendency to judge character based on appearance. Our journey will extend beyond this particular phrase, touching upon other similar 'never trust' adages and ultimately emphasizing the importance of cultivating genuine trust based on actions and character, rather than superficial traits. This isn't just about a quirky saying; it's about understanding the biases that shape our interactions and, crucially, making informed decisions in areas that truly matter, touching upon the very essence of 'Your Money or Your Life' principles when it comes to who we place our faith in.

Deconstructing the Adverb "Never"

Before we dive into the specifics of eyes, it's crucial to understand the absolute nature of the word "never." The meaning of "never" is "not ever," implying an absolute absence, a complete negation across all time. It signifies that a certain action or event has not occurred at any point in the past, nor will it occur at any point in the future. "Not at any time or not on any occasion" captures this perfectly. When someone says, "He had never been there before," it means he has not, at any time in his life, visited that place. Similarly, if you're "never going to win a Monopoly game against your brother," it implies you won't beat him next week, next year, or ever. "Never" is an adverb that indicates an absence of something happening or a negative response to a question or request. It's often "used as a way of saying never with extra emphasis," as in, "Never! I finally finished, and I never want to do that again!" This emphatic use underscores the finality and impossibility conveyed by the word. "To no extent or degree" also defines "never," highlighting the complete lack of something. For instance, "He was never the wiser for his experience" means his experience did not make him any wiser at all. The phrase "never trust" therefore implies an absolute and perpetual state of distrust, suggesting that under no circumstances, at no time in the past or future, should one place their faith in such an individual. This strong, unwavering directive is what makes these folk sayings so impactful, demanding a complete and utter dismissal of a person based on a single, often superficial, trait.

The Origins of Whimsical Warnings

Society has a long history of creating and propagating pithy sayings, proverbs, and warnings, many of which are rooted in observation, superstition, or simply a desire to encapsulate complex social dynamics into easily digestible phrases. These "whimsical quotes" often serve as a form of cultural shorthand, passed down through generations, offering advice or caution in a memorable format. They range from the universally accepted, like "look before you leap," to the more peculiar and anecdotal, such as "never trust a man, who when left alone with a tea cosy..." These sayings often emerge from collective experiences or perceived patterns, even if those patterns lack scientific basis. The beauty and peril of such adages lie in their simplicity. They are easy to remember and repeat, becoming part of the common lexicon. However, their very nature of being concise often means they oversimplify complex realities, leading to generalizations that can be misleading or even harmful. The "never trust" category of sayings is particularly potent because it deals with the fundamental human need for security and reliability. Trust is the bedrock of all relationships, and any perceived threat to it can trigger a strong, cautionary response. Thus, phrases like "never trust a man with two first names" (a saying that almost certainly existed long before its popularization by MST3K, which merely riffed on an existing notion) or "never trust a man who combs his hair straight from his left armpit" become cultural markers, however absurd they may seem upon closer inspection. They reflect a human tendency to seek patterns and explanations, even if those patterns are entirely coincidental or based on unfounded prejudice.

Unpacking "Never Trust a Man with Eyes Too Close Together"

Now, let's turn our attention to the core of our discussion: "never trust a man with eyes too close together" or its variation, "never trust a man whose eyes are too close to his nose." This specific physical trait—close-set eyes—has, for reasons largely rooted in cultural perception rather than scientific fact, become associated with a lack of trustworthiness. The saying implies that this particular facial feature is an immediate red flag, a visual cue that signals a deceptive or unreliable character. But what exactly constitutes "eyes too close together," and is there any anatomical or psychological basis for this widespread suspicion? "Close set eyes are when the eyes are closer together than normal." This isn't a real medical condition but it is a common description of an appearance trait. The normal distance from the inter corner of one eye to the other eye is 3.3 cm on most attractive faces. Deviations from this perceived ideal, whether eyes are too close or too far apart, can influence how a face is perceived. The saying suggests that this specific deviation is indicative of a moral failing, a leap that requires significant scrutiny.

Is It a Medical Condition?

It's important to clarify that having close-set eyes is not a medical condition. As the data states, "This isn’t a real medical condition but it is a common description of an appearance trait." It's simply a variation in facial anatomy, much like the shape of one's nose or the fullness of their lips. While extreme cases of very wide-set or very close-set eyes might be associated with certain genetic syndromes or developmental conditions, the general characteristic of "eyes too close together" in the context of this saying refers to a common, non-pathological facial feature. To attribute a person's character, particularly their trustworthiness, to a non-medical anatomical variation is a form of physiognomy – the practice of assessing a person's character or personality from their outer appearance, especially the face. Historically, physiognomy has been used to make broad generalizations about individuals, often leading to prejudice and discrimination. While our brains are wired to make quick judgments based on visual cues, these snap judgments are often inaccurate and can lead us astray, particularly when it comes to complex traits like trust. The saying, therefore, operates on a principle that has largely been debunked as a reliable method of character assessment.

The Perception of Attractiveness and Symmetry

Interestingly, the perception of close-set eyes varies across genders and within the spectrum of "normal" facial features. The data suggests, "Closer eyes are actually more attractive in men if it is not extreme." This points to the concept of facial dimorphism, where certain features are perceived differently or hold different aesthetic values depending on whether they appear on a male or female face. It is noted that "It is a bigger flaw in women, like how wider eyes are a bigger flaw in men, Just facial dimorphism since men have smaller" facial features in general. This highlights that attractiveness is subjective and culturally influenced, and what is considered an ideal facial proportion can differ between sexes. The human brain often perceives symmetry and adherence to perceived "average" or "ideal" proportions as attractive. The "normal distance from the inter corner of one eye to the other eye is 3.3 cm on most attractive faces." Deviations from this average can sometimes be perceived as less attractive, but this is a far cry from indicating a person's moral character. The saying conflates aesthetic preference with ethical standing, creating a biased framework for judgment. While "the nose bridge is too projected or too narrow it can make the" eyes appear closer or wider, this is still a matter of anatomical variation, not a reflection of inner virtue or vice. The fact that "perhaps Ryan Gosling belongs here" (in a discussion of attractive facial features) underscores that even within the realm of perceived "close-set" eyes, individual attractiveness is highly subjective and not a reliable indicator of character.

The Psychology Behind Facial Characteristics and Trust

The human brain is incredibly adept at processing facial information, often making rapid, subconscious judgments about a person's personality, mood, and even trustworthiness based on their appearance. This field, known as social perception, delves into "the psychology behind facial characteristics." Studies have shown that certain facial features can trigger specific perceptions. For example, people with wider faces are sometimes perceived as more dominant, while those with softer features might be seen as more agreeable. The researchers also confirmed a strong correlation between eye color and facial shape, indicating the intricate ways different features contribute to overall perception. However, these initial perceptions are often mere heuristics – mental shortcuts that can be wildly inaccurate. While our evolutionary past might have favored quick judgments for survival, in complex social interactions, relying solely on appearance for assessing trustworthiness is fraught with peril. Trust, in its true sense, is built on consistent behavior, integrity, honesty, and reliability. It's about actions, not aesthetics. A person's facial features are largely determined by genetics and development; they are not chosen and certainly do not encode moral character. The saying "never trust a man with eyes too close together" exploits this innate human tendency to make quick judgments, but it misdirects it towards a superficial and irrelevant trait. True psychological understanding emphasizes that character is formed through experiences, choices, and values, not through the distance between one's eyes.

Beyond the Eyes: Other "Never Trust" Adages

The adage about close-set eyes is just one of many "never trust" sayings that pepper our cultural landscape. These phrases, often humorous or cynical, reflect a broader human tendency to categorize and warn against perceived dangers or undesirable traits. They highlight the various, often arbitrary, criteria people have used throughout history to judge others. Consider some other examples from the provided data: * **"Never trust a man with two first names."** This saying, popularized in some circles but with roots predating its modern references, plays on the idea that someone with two common first names (e.g., "Billy Bob" or "John Paul") might be trying too hard, or perhaps is just a bit too unconventional to be fully reliable. It's a whimsical, often unfounded, judgment. * **"Never trust a man whose eyes are too close to his nose."** This is a direct variation of our main topic, emphasizing the same physical trait but specifying its relation to another facial feature. It reinforces the arbitrary nature of such specific physical judgments. * **"Never trust a man who combs his hair straight from his left armpit."** This is clearly a hyperbolic and humorous example, designed to evoke an image of extreme peculiarity or unkemptness, implying that such a person's judgment or reliability might be questionable. It's a caricature of untrustworthiness. * **"Always sit close to an exit and never trust a man who doesn't sweat."** This is an interesting one, linking a physiological response (sweating) to trustworthiness. The implication might be that someone who doesn't sweat is unnaturally calm, perhaps even cold or unfeeling, and therefore untrustworthy. It taps into a primal sense of discomfort with those who seem to lack normal human reactions. These examples collectively illustrate that "never trust" sayings are less about actual indicators of trustworthiness and more about cultural quirks, personal biases, or even just playful observations. They serve as a reminder that while it's natural to form impressions, relying on such superficial cues for serious judgments about character can be deeply misleading. The common thread is the attempt to find simple, observable markers for complex internal states, a quest that almost always falls short.

The Danger of Superficial Judgments: A YMYL Perspective

While "never trust a man with eyes too close together" might seem like a harmless, quirky saying, the underlying principle of judging individuals based on superficial characteristics carries significant risks, particularly when we consider the YMYL (Your Money or Your Life) implications. In critical areas such as financial decisions, health choices, or even personal safety, placing trust in or withholding it from someone based on their appearance can have severe, real-world consequences. Imagine making a financial investment with someone because they have an "open, honest face," only to discover they are a con artist. Conversely, imagine dismissing a highly competent and ethical financial advisor, doctor, or legal counsel simply because their eyes are "too close together." Such decisions, based on unfounded biases rather than due diligence, can directly impact your financial well-being, health, and overall security. The "Your Money or Your Life" framework emphasizes the importance of accurate, reliable information and sound judgment in areas that directly affect one's prosperity, health, and safety. Relying on physiognomy or folk sayings to determine trustworthiness is antithetical to this principle. It replaces evidence-based assessment with superstition and prejudice. In a world where scams are prevalent and misinformation can spread rapidly, the ability to discern true trustworthiness becomes paramount. This requires looking beyond the surface – beyond the eyes, the hair, or any other physical trait – and evaluating a person's track record, their professional credentials, their ethical conduct, and the consistency of their actions. As the saying goes, "you may be deceived if you trust too much, but you will live in torment if you do not trust enough." The key is to trust wisely, based on substance, not superficiality.

Cultivating True Trust: A Deeper Look If physical appearance is an unreliable indicator, what then truly forms the bedrock of trust? Cultivating genuine trust, whether in personal relationships, professional collaborations, or even in choosing a service provider, requires a much deeper and more nuanced approach than simply observing facial features. Trust is built on a foundation of consistent actions, transparency, integrity, and shared values. Here are key elements that truly foster trust: * **Consistency:** A trustworthy person demonstrates reliability over time. They follow through on their commitments, their words align with their actions, and their behavior is predictable in a positive sense. * **Integrity:** This involves honesty, strong moral principles, and a commitment to doing the right thing, even when no one is watching. A person of integrity is transparent about their intentions and operates with an ethical compass. * **Competence:** In professional contexts, trust is often tied to a person's ability to perform their job effectively and deliver results. We trust experts because they demonstrate knowledge and skill in their field. * **Empathy and Care:** Knowing that someone genuinely cares about your well-being and can understand your perspective fosters a deep sense of trust. This is particularly true in personal relationships and in professions like healthcare. * **Communication:** Open, honest, and clear communication is vital. A trustworthy person communicates transparently, admits mistakes, and is willing to have difficult conversations. * **Vulnerability (Appropriate):** The willingness to be vulnerable, to admit limitations or seek help, can paradoxically build trust by showing authenticity and humanity. These are the qualities that truly matter when assessing someone's trustworthiness, not the spacing of their eyes or the way they comb their hair. Relying on such superficial cues means missing out on potentially valuable relationships and opportunities, while simultaneously exposing oneself to risks by misjudging those who might appear trustworthy but lack substance.

Navigating Human Interaction with Nuance

In navigating the complexities of human interaction, a nuanced approach is always superior to rigid, generalized rules. While our brains are wired for pattern recognition and quick judgments, true wisdom lies in recognizing when these shortcuts are helpful and when they lead us astray. The saying "never trust a man with eyes too close together" is a prime example of a shortcut that, while perhaps amusing, is ultimately unhelpful and potentially harmful. Instead of adhering to such arbitrary rules, we should cultivate critical thinking and observational skills that focus on behavior, character, and consistency. This means: * **Observing Actions Over Appearance:** Pay attention to how a person treats others, how they respond to challenges, and whether their words align with their deeds. * **Seeking Evidence:** In important decisions (YMYL areas), don't rely on gut feelings alone. Seek references, check credentials, and gather objective information. * **Challenging Biases:** Be aware of your own inherent biases and actively work to overcome them. Everyone has them, and acknowledging them is the first step towards fairer, more accurate judgments. * **Practicing Patience:** Trust is built over time. It's a process of observation and verification, not an instant assessment based on a glance. "Never turn down an opportunity, even if you’re not sure, as you never know where it might take you." This quote, while not directly about trust, embodies the spirit of openness and exploration that contrasts sharply with the closed-mindedness of judging solely on appearance. It encourages engaging with the world and its people, rather than retreating behind simplistic, prejudiced rules.

Conclusion

The adage "never trust a man with eyes too close together" is a fascinating piece of cultural folklore, a testament to humanity's enduring quest to find simple explanations for complex realities. As we've explored, the word "never" implies an absolute and unwavering distrust, yet the basis for this particular warning—a common facial feature—holds no scientific or psychological merit. Close-set eyes are merely a variation in human anatomy, not a predictor of character or trustworthiness. While our brains are wired to make rapid assessments based on appearance, true trust is forged through consistent, ethical behavior, integrity, and competence. Relying on superficial cues, especially in "Your Money or Your Life" situations, can lead to poor decisions with significant consequences. Instead of embracing arbitrary rules, we are encouraged to cultivate a deeper understanding of human nature, focusing on actions, transparency, and a nuanced approach to building relationships. So, the next time you hear this whimsical warning, remember to look beyond the surface and evaluate individuals based on the substance of their character, not the spacing of their eyes. What are your thoughts on such folk sayings? Share your experiences and perspectives in the comments below, and explore more articles on critical thinking and human behavior on our site!

Details

Never trust a man whose eyes are too close together... | Flickr

Details

Eyes Really Close Together

Details

Never trust a man who’s eyes are this close together. 👀 : CallHerDaddy