Unpacking The Myth: Why 'I Thought Targaryens Couldn't Burn'
For many fans of George R.R. Martin's epic "A Song of Ice and Fire" series and its acclaimed adaptations, "Game of Thrones" and "House of the Dragon," a common and deeply ingrained belief persists: the idea that Targaryens are inherently immune to fire. This prevailing thought, often expressed as "i thought targaryens couldn't burn," has become a cornerstone of fan discussions, fueled by memorable scenes and a general aura of mystique surrounding the dragon-riding dynasty. It's a fascinating example of how a singular, impactful moment in storytelling can lead to a widespread misconception, shaping the collective understanding of an entire fictional lineage.
However, a closer examination of the source material reveals a more nuanced reality. The notion that all Targaryens are fireproof is, in fact, a pervasive myth, one that the author himself has repeatedly sought to clarify. This article aims to meticulously dissect this misconception, exploring its origins, presenting canonical evidence to the contrary, and ultimately providing a comprehensive understanding of why, despite the popular refrain, the thought that Targaryens are immune to fire simply doesn't hold up to scrutiny within the rich tapestry of Westerosi lore. We will delve into the specific events that birthed this widespread belief and contrast them with the many instances where Targaryens have, indeed, met fiery ends.
Table of Contents
- The Enduring Myth: Where Did the Thought Originate?
- Daenerys Targaryen: The Catalyst for This Thought
- The Canon Speaks: Targaryens Are Not Fireproof
- Understanding the Magic: Why Daenerys Was Different
- The Author's Intent: George R.R. Martin's Stance
- Beyond Fire: Other Targaryen Traits and Resistances
- The Psychological Impact: Why This Thought Persists
- Debunking Misconceptions: The Importance of Critical Thought
The Enduring Myth: Where Did the Thought Originate?
The widespread belief, often summarized as "i thought targaryens couldn't burn," didn't emerge from a vacuum. It is a product of specific, highly impactful narrative moments within the "A Song of Ice and Fire" saga, primarily centered around the character of Daenerys Targaryen. For many, their first introduction to the world of Westeros was through HBO's "Game of Thrones," where the visual medium amplified certain events, making them appear more definitive than they might have been described in the books. The act of thinking about or considering something, especially in the context of a fictional world, often relies heavily on the most dramatic and memorable scenes.
The Targaryens, with their silver hair, purple eyes, and connection to dragons, have always been portrayed as an exceptional, almost mystical lineage. This inherent otherworldliness naturally lends itself to the formation of extraordinary myths around them. When coupled with specific instances of apparent fire immunity, particularly those involving a beloved protagonist, the idea solidifies into a firm belief. It becomes a judgment, an opinion, or a belief that is hard to shake, even when confronted with contradictory evidence. The capacity or faculty of thinking, reasoning, and imagining in fans often fills in gaps with what feels most epic or fitting for such a grand dynasty.
The product of mental activity, this "fireproof" thought, is a testament to the power of visual storytelling and selective memory. While the books offer subtle clues and explicit counter-examples, the sheer spectacle of certain scenes in the show often overrides the more nuanced textual information. This phenomenon is not unique to "Game of Thrones"; it's a common aspect of how audiences engage with complex narratives, where the most striking images leave the deepest imprint on our collective consciousness. The intellectual activity or the ideas characteristic of early fandom often focused on these perceived unique traits, solidifying the misconception.
Daenerys Targaryen: The Catalyst for This Thought
When someone says, "i thought targaryens couldn't burn," their mind almost invariably goes to Daenerys Targaryen. She is, without a doubt, the primary reason this misconception took root and flourished. Her experiences with fire are unique and pivotal, leading many to extrapolate her specific circumstances to her entire lineage. This single act or product of thinking, based on her apparent immunity, became the foundation of the myth.
The Pyre and the Dragons: A Unique Event
The most iconic and defining moment that cemented the "fireproof Targaryen" idea occurred at the end of the first season of "Game of Thrones" (and the first book, "A Game of Thrones"). After the death of Khal Drogo, Daenerys places her three fossilized dragon eggs onto his funeral pyre. She then walks into the inferno, emerging unscathed, cradling three newborn dragons. This scene is breathtaking, miraculous, and utterly unforgettable.
It is here that the prevailing thought, "Targaryens are fireproof," truly begins. Viewers and readers alike were stunned. How could she survive such a blaze? The logical conclusion, given her Targaryen heritage and the magical nature of the event, was that her bloodline granted her immunity. This was a moment of pure fantasy, a powerful symbol of rebirth and magic entering the world. However, it was also an exceptionally rare confluence of events. George R.R. Martin himself has stated that this was a singular, magical event, not a typical Targaryen trait. It was about the birth of dragons and Daenerys's unique connection to them, not a generic immunity to flame. My first thought upon seeing this was that something truly extraordinary had happened, but the subsequent generalization was a misstep.
Subsequent "Fireproof" Moments: Context is Key
Throughout "Game of Thrones," Daenerys has other moments where she appears unharmed by fire, further reinforcing the "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" notion.
- The House of the Undying (Season 2): Daenerys enters a burning structure and emerges with her dragons, seemingly unharmed by the flames within. However, the focus here is on the magical illusions and the rescue by her dragons, rather than her personal immunity. The fire itself was a magical construct, not a natural blaze.
- Burning the Dothraki Khals (Season 6): In a powerful scene, Daenerys sets fire to the temple of the Dosh Khaleen, where she is being held captive by the Dothraki khals. She emerges naked and unharmed from the blazing structure, solidifying her power and leading the Dothraki to follow her. This scene, more than any other since the pyre, strongly reinforced the idea of her fire immunity for many viewers.
While these scenes are visually striking, it's crucial to understand the context. In the books, these moments are often depicted with more ambiguity or are not explicitly portrayed as her being "fireproof" in the same absolute sense. The show, for dramatic effect, often chose to highlight her apparent immunity more explicitly. The product of mental activity in viewers, shaped by these dramatic visuals, led to the firm belief that this was a standard Targaryen trait. The thought of her being truly vulnerable to fire, after witnessing these events, simply didn't cross many minds.
The Canon Speaks: Targaryens Are Not Fireproof
Despite the strong visual evidence from Daenerys's story, the lore of "A Song of Ice and Fire" is clear: Targaryens are not inherently immune to fire. The thought that they are is a misconception. This is one of the key areas where the show's dramatic license diverged slightly from the author's stated intentions and the broader history of the Targaryen dynasty as depicted in the books.
Viserys Targaryen: A Fiery End
Perhaps the most direct and undeniable counter-example to the "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" myth is the death of Daenerys's own brother, Viserys Targaryen. In both the books and the show, Viserys demands his "golden crown" from Khal Drogo. Drogo obliges by melting gold and pouring it over Viserys's head. Viserys dies a horrific, fiery death.
This scene is a brutal, visceral reminder that Targaryen blood does not grant immunity to extreme heat or molten metal. Viserys was as much a Targaryen as Daenerys, yet he perished in a fiery manner. This single, stark example should, by all logical reasoning, immediately dispel the notion of inherent fire immunity for the entire bloodline. The very thought of him surviving such an ordeal is absurd within the established rules of the world. It serves as a powerful argument against the generalized belief.
Other Targaryens in the Lore: Vulnerability to Fire
Beyond Viserys, the extensive history of the Targaryen dynasty, particularly as detailed in "Fire & Blood" and other supplementary materials, provides numerous instances of Targaryens suffering from, and dying by, fire. The idea or just the thing you're thinking about when considering Targaryen history should include these examples.
- The Tragedy at Summerhall: This is a pivotal event in Targaryen history, occurring just before the main series. King Aegon V Targaryen (Egg), his son Duncan, and many others, including a pregnant Princess Rhaella (mother of Aerys II, the Mad King), perished in a catastrophic fire at Summerhall. They were attempting to hatch dragon eggs through a magical ritual that went horribly wrong. This incident explicitly demonstrates that Targaryens are vulnerable to fire, even when engaged in dragon-related magic. The thought of them being immune is directly contradicted here.
- Aerion Brightflame: A particularly mad Targaryen prince, Aerion, believed he could transform into a dragon by drinking wildfire. He died a slow, agonizing death from the inside out, proving that Targaryens are very much susceptible to the destructive power of fire, especially magical fire like wildfire. His demise is a grim testament to their vulnerability.
- Other Dragonrider Deaths: Throughout the Dance of the Dragons, the Targaryen civil war, many dragonriders (who were almost exclusively Targaryens or Velaryons with Targaryen blood) died alongside their dragons in fiery battles. While some deaths were from falls or dragon attacks, many were caught in the inferno of dragonfire. They were not immune to the flames unleashed by other dragons or by their own mounts.
These historical accounts paint a clear picture: Targaryens are not fireproof. They can be burned, and they have died from fire. The thought that their bloodline grants them blanket immunity is simply not supported by the vast majority of their history. It's a judgment, an opinion, or a belief that is inconsistent with the established lore.
Understanding the Magic: Why Daenerys Was Different
If the common thought "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" is a myth, and historical evidence shows Targaryens are vulnerable to fire, then why did Daenerys survive the pyre and other fiery encounters? This is where the nuanced understanding of George R.R. Martin's magic system comes into play.
Martin's magic is often subtle, rare, and tied to specific circumstances, not broad genetic traits. Daenerys's survival of the pyre was not simply because she was a Targaryen. It was a unique, one-time magical event tied to the reawakening of dragons in the world. As Martin himself has explained, it was a miracle, a "birth" event, not an inherent ability. She walked into the fire with dragon eggs that were hatching, and the magic of that moment protected her. It was a specific ritual, a sacrifice, and a rebirth, all rolled into one. It was not a demonstration of a standing Targaryen immunity. The act or process of thinking about this event requires considering all its magical components, not just her lineage.
Subsequent "fireproof" moments, particularly in the show, are often more about dramatic flair or specific plot points than a consistent magical ability. While the show may have played up her apparent immunity for visual impact, the books consistently portray her as a human being, susceptible to injuries and the elements, just like anyone else. She is not shown casually walking through fires or being unaffected by intense heat in the same way she was on the pyre. The thought of doing something like that, without the specific magical context, would be foolish for any character, Targaryen or not.
The unique nature of Daenerys's experiences underscores that her survival was an anomaly, a magical exception, rather than the rule for her entire family. It was a powerful narrative device to establish her as a significant magical figure, the Mother of Dragons, but it was misinterpreted as a generic Targaryen trait. This intellectual activity, characteristic of early fandom, sometimes oversimplified complex magical events into straightforward abilities.
The Author's Intent: George R.R. Martin's Stance
Perhaps the most authoritative voice on the matter of whether "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" is true is George R.R. Martin himself. The author has repeatedly addressed this misconception in interviews, on his blog, and in Q&A sessions. His stance is unequivocal: Targaryens are not immune to fire.
Martin has clarified that Daenerys's pyre experience was a singular, miraculous event, driven by the magical circumstances of the dragon hatching. He has stated that it was not meant to establish a general rule for all Targaryens. He often points to Viserys's death and the tragedy at Summerhall as direct evidence that Targaryens can and do burn. His words are the definitive source, as he is the creator of this world and its rules.
The meaning of thought in this context refers to the author's clear intention and the definitive statements he has made. Despite his clarifications, the popular thought persists, demonstrating how deeply ingrained certain narrative impressions can become. It's a testament to the power of a striking image or scene that it can overshadow explicit authorial statements. This shows that the product of mental activity, once formed, can be incredibly resistant to change, even when presented with direct evidence from the creator. The thought of leaving this misconception behind often requires a conscious effort from fans.
Beyond Fire: Other Targaryen Traits and Resistances
While the thought "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" is incorrect, Targaryens do possess other distinctive traits and, arguably, some minor resistances or predispositions due to their Valyrian heritage and dragon-riding history. These traits, however, are often misinterpreted or exaggerated.
- Heat Resistance (Not Immunity): Some Targaryens, like Daenerys, have shown a higher tolerance for heat than an average person. For instance, Daenerys is often depicted taking baths in water that is too hot for others, or handling hot objects without discomfort. This is a far cry from immunity to dragonfire or molten gold. It's a resistance, not an invulnerability. This subtle difference is often lost in the broader thought process of fans.
- Prophetic Dreams and Visions: Many Targaryens throughout history have experienced prophetic dreams or visions, a trait sometimes attributed to their Valyrian blood. This is a magical predisposition, but it has no bearing on physical resistance to elements.
- "Dragon Dreams": Specific to some Targaryens, these are dreams that are particularly vivid and sometimes prophetic, often involving dragons. Aegon the Conqueror's decision to invade Westeros was reportedly influenced by a "dragon dream."
- The "Targaryen Madness": A more ominous trait, the Targaryen bloodline is often associated with a higher propensity for madness, with the saying going "every time a Targaryen is born, the gods toss a coin." This is a psychological vulnerability, not a physical resistance.
- Bond with Dragons: The most significant and unique trait is their ability to bond with and ride dragons. This is a magical connection, likely genetic, that sets them apart from almost all other people in Westeros. This bond, however, does not confer physical immunity to fire. A dragonrider can still be burned by their own dragon or an enemy dragon.
These genuine Targaryen characteristics contribute to their mystique and set them apart, but none of them grant blanket immunity to fire. The capacity or faculty of thinking about these traits should distinguish between true magical abilities and mere resistance or predisposition. The prevailing thought often conflates these distinct characteristics into one overarching superpower.
The Psychological Impact: Why This Thought Persists
Even with clear evidence and authorial statements, the thought "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" continues to persist among a significant portion of the fandom. Why is this misconception so resilient?
- Dramatic Impact: The visual spectacle of Daenerys emerging from fire, particularly in "Game of Thrones," is incredibly powerful. These scenes are designed for maximum impact and memorability. The product of mental activity often prioritizes these dramatic moments over more subtle lore details.
- Wish Fulfillment: For many, the idea of a fireproof dragon rider is inherently cool and aligns with the epic fantasy genre. It makes the Targaryens even more special and powerful, fulfilling a certain fan desire for extraordinary heroes.
- Confirmation Bias: Once the initial thought is formed, people tend to seek out and interpret information in a way that confirms their existing beliefs, while dismissing contradictory evidence. Any scene where a Targaryen is near fire and unharmed reinforces the bias, while scenes like Viserys's death are rationalized as exceptions or overlooked.
- Word-of-Mouth Fandom: New fans often enter the community and hear this "fact" from older fans, perpetuating the myth without checking the source material themselves. It becomes an accepted piece of fan lore.
- Simplification of Complex Magic: George R.R. Martin's magic is often subtle and tied to specific circumstances. Fans sometimes prefer simpler, more straightforward magical rules, leading to the generalization of Daenerys's unique event into a universal Targaryen trait. The act of thinking about complex magical systems can be tiring, leading to simplified conclusions.
The persistence of this thought highlights the complex interplay between narrative, audience perception, and the formation of collective beliefs within a fandom. It's a fascinating case study in how information, even within a fictional context, can be interpreted and reinterpreted.
Debunking Misconceptions: The Importance of Critical Thought
Ultimately, understanding why "i thought targaryens couldn't burn" is a myth is not just about correcting a factual error within a fictional world. It's also about appreciating the depth and nuance of George R.R. Martin's storytelling. His world is gritty, realistic (within its fantasy parameters), and rarely grants characters absolute, simplistic powers. Magic comes with a cost, and even the most extraordinary individuals have vulnerabilities.
The act of thinking about or considering something critically, rather than accepting surface-level interpretations, enriches the experience of engaging with complex narratives. It encourages readers and viewers to delve deeper, to question assumptions, and to seek out the author's true intent. This process of thinking, judging, and forming opinions based on comprehensive evidence is crucial.
So, the next time the thought crosses your mind, or you hear someone say, "i thought targaryens couldn't burn," remember Viserys's golden crown, the tragedy of Summerhall, and George R.R. Martin's own words. Remember that Daenerys's fiery rebirth was a singular miracle, not a genetic trait. It's a powerful moment that defined her, but it doesn't define her entire lineage. The product of mental activity that leads to this misconception is understandable, given the dramatic presentation, but the true lore paints a different, more complex, and ultimately more compelling picture of the dragonlords of Westeros. The thought of leaving never crossed my mind when diving into this rich lore.
We hope this comprehensive breakdown has clarified the truth behind this popular misconception. What are your thoughts on this enduring myth? Did you also believe that Targaryens were fireproof, or were you aware of the nuances in the lore? Share your opinions and insights in the comments below! If you enjoyed this deep dive, consider exploring our other articles on the intricate world of Westeros and beyond.
Unburn Targaryen always comes out from fire without clothes. Dragonfire
Anyone else remember Jon burning his hand? Targaryens aren't fire proof
The Wertzone: So, are the Targaryens immune to fire?
